Ethical Non-Monogamy After Betrayal
Why Intent, Consent, and Communication Matter
Monogamy is often considered the default setting for romantic relationships while rooted in exclusivity, commitment, and the promise of a devoted partnership between two people. While this model works well for many, it’s not the only way people choose to build connection and intimacy. Non-monogamous relationships have become increasingly more popular, with some estimates that 1 in 5 adults in the US and Canada have engaged in some type of consensually non-monogamous relationship.
Despite its growing presence, ethical non-monogamy (ENM) still carries a stigma—often misunderstood or conflated with cheating, betrayal, or a lack of commitment. This confusion becomes especially complex when ENM is introduced after infidelity has occurred, raising difficult questions about trust, consent, and the decision to shift a relationship structure following such a significant rupture.
Can a relationship move from secrecy and betrayal to openness and consent? Is agreeing to ENM after infidelity a path to healing, or a way to avoid accountability? These are not easy questions, and navigating them requires a deep understanding of intent, communication, and the nature of true consent.
Infidelity is Not Ethical Non-Monogamy
Before going any further it’s important to clarify that ENM and infidelity are vastly different. While both involve the act of having multiple partners, the critical distinction is ENM requires mutual consent, communication, and honesty. Whereas infidelity thrives on secrecy, deception, and repeated violations of a partner’s boundaries. Continued infidelity and longstanding affairs are built on broken trust and betrayal which creates deep wounds in the relationship.
In contrast, ENM is rooted in transparency, mutual respect, and open communication. In a truly ethical and consensual non-monogamous relationship, all parties are fully aware of and agree to the structure and boundaries of the relationship. However, when infidelity is at play, an unfaithful partner may attempt to disguise their actions as ENM to affair partners. They may claim that their primary partner is aware of and consents to the multiple relationships, when in fact, the partner is completely unaware. This misuse of the ENM framework not only undermines the understanding of non-monogamous relationships but also magnifies the dishonesty that is already at the core of infidelity.
The Power of Intent
Although betrayal and infidelity are often considered the harbingers of doom to a relationship, sometimes they signal a new beginning rather than a relationship’s ending. This is because people are capable of change and growth while relationships among people are constantly evolving. For some couples, the aftermath of betrayal becomes an opportunity to re-examine their values, rebuild trust, and explore new ways of connecting. For some, this may include the possibility of ethical non-monogamy.
This may be because one or both partners realize that monogamy is not the relationship structure that best aligns with their individual needs. Or perhaps exclusivity was simply assumed as the default, until infidelity disrupted their understanding of what a relationship “should” look like. In such cases, the pain of betrayal can lead to a shift in mindset and set the stage for a new relationship including trust, improved communication, and even the idea of ENM.
However, when considering this shift to ENM intent is one of the most important matters to consider. For example, if the intent is simply for a partner to continue their relationship with a previous affair partner, without addressing the underlying issues of betrayal or ensuring mutual consent, then the transition to ENM is likely to be rooted in dishonesty and avoidance. This could lead to further hurt, manipulation, and a deepening of the emotional wounds already caused by infidelity. In such cases, the betrayed partner and the affair partner have likely been wounded by the unfaithful partner’s dishonesty. So, time and work would need to be built into rebuilding trust with all parties.
While this is possible, it’s unlikely that the necessary work could be done while also navigating the chaos and pain of affair discovery. Unfortunately, in such cases the intention to shift to ENM may not be rooted in transparency and honesty, but rather avoiding the inner work required to address the deep emotional wounds of betrayal. The painful reality of infidelity demands a level of introspection and accountability that cannot be bypassed by simply changing the relationship structure. Before any meaningful shift toward ENM can occur, the unfaithful partner must take full responsibility for their actions and address the trust violations that have taken place.
Redefining Consent: Ensuring True Mutual Agreement After Infidelity
Often, after an affair has occurred the unfaithful partner will continue contact with their affair partner in secrecy. In such cases, they may encourage the betrayed partner to consent to ENM and present it as a way to evolve their relationship and grow together after the betrayal. However, if the unfaithful partner is using ENM as a means of continuing their affair without fully disclosing this to the betrayed partner, then it would violate the core tenets of ethical or consensual non-monogamy. True ENM is built on transparency, trust, and mutual consent. These values that are completely undermined if the unfaithful partner is still secretly involved with someone else, especially without the knowledge or agreement of the betrayed partner.
Even if years have passed since the affair occurred, the betrayed partner may still question whether the unfaithful partner is proposing ENM as a means of maintaining or reigniting their connection with the affair partner. If that is truly the intention behind pursuing ENM, all parties must be fully informed before moving forward. Otherwise, what follows will simply be another iteration of a non-consensual relationship and a continuation of betrayal.
Another important consideration regarding consent is the power dynamic that exists after an affair. The betrayed partner often feels vulnerable, hurt, and uncertain about the future of the relationship. In such an emotionally charged environment, the unfaithful partner may have more influence over the direction of the relationship, especially when suggesting the transition to ENM. The betrayed partner may feel pressured to agree to ENM not because they genuinely want it, but out of fear of losing their partner or a desire to “fix” the relationship.
When consent is given under these conditions, it is not fully informed or free. The emotional vulnerability of the betrayed partner can lead them to make decisions from a place of insecurity or fear of losing their relationship. For true consent to exist, the unfaithful partner must recognize the emotional power imbalance and allow space for the betrayed partner to make an autonomous decision without manipulation or pressure. Any shift to ENM must come from a place of mutual understanding and respect for each person’s emotional state and desires.
Rebuilding Trust Through Communication:
Effective communication is at the heart of any healthy relationship, but it becomes even more crucial when transitioning to ethical non-monogamy after an affair. Open and honest conversations are essential to rebuild trust and ensure that both partners are fully on the same page about their desires, boundaries, and expectations after the betrayal. Boundaries are especially important, as they help define what is acceptable as the relationship continues to evolve.
For ENM to work, both partners must engage in ongoing dialogue about their feelings, needs, and any concerns or insecurities that arise. This includes respecting each other’s boundaries to ensure that all parties involved feel safe and respected. Transparent communication fosters the necessary respect and mutual understanding for healing and navigating the shift toward ENM. By discussing and honoring boundaries, couples can create a healthier and more balanced approach to ENM, free from the damage caused by the affair.
Transitioning to a truly ethical and consensual non-monogamous relationship after betrayal is possible. Both individuals and the relationships we create are incredibly resilient and capable of evolving over time. However, this transition is unlikely to be quick and easy. It requires patience, self-reflection, and a deep commitment to rebuilding trust and communication in order for all parties involved to feel safe, respected, and genuinely invested in the new relationship structure.
——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————
Reminder: These posts are not intended as a substitute for therapy.
Are you searching for a new therapist in the state of Florida, South Carolina, or Vermont? Marching Forward Therapy has limited spots available for new clients seeking support with issues such as ethical non-monogamy, gender, sexual functioning, and relationship dynamics. We offer individual, couples, and group therapy. If you’re navigating these challenges, let’s explore how we can work together to create lasting, meaningful change.
